Pioneering Domain Name Protection in Indian IPR Law
Yahoo v Akash Arora established domain names protection in Indian law by recognising cybersquatting and passing off. The Delhi High Court upheld transborder reputation, confirming that deceptively similar domain names can infringe trademark rights and cause consumer confusion in digital markets.
FABINDIA OVERSEAS PVT LTD v. FAB INDIA EMPORIUM
Fabindia trademark infringement case highlights deceptive similarity and passing off principles. The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction against Fab India Emporium, reaffirming strong protection against trademark infringement where deceptive similarity causes consumer confusion and damages brand goodwill.
LANDMARK TRADEMARK INJUNCTION IN PHARMACEUTICAL COUNTERFEITING
Allegra trademark injunction: Bombay HC penalizes pharma counterfeiting and contempt of court.
FAMOUS TRADEMARK PROTECTION WIN
Louis Vuitton secures major win for famous trademark protection, proving brand rights extend beyond industry lines and borders.
NFT TRADEMARK DISPUTE
The Hermès v. Rothschild case is a landmark NFT trademark dispute shaping brand rights and artistic freedom in the metaverse.
TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT INDIA
Delhi High Court ruling strengthens protections against trade dress infringement, reinforcing Cadbury’s rights in a consumer-focused judgment.
PHARMA PATENT CLASH REDEFINES ACCESS
Pharma Patent Clash Redefines Access: Landmark Cipla v. Roche case reshaped India’s patent law, balancing innovation with public health.
INDIA REJECTS NOVARTIS PATENT BID
The Novartis patent bid was rejected in India, setting a landmark precedent in balancing innovation and public health access.
ALICE SOFTWARE PATENTS RULING
The Alice software patents case redefined eligibility, creating lasting uncertainty in tech and legal innovation.
ACTAVIS V. ELI LILLY: UK PATENT LAW REDEFINED
Explore how Actavis v Eli Lilly (2017) reshaped UK patent law with the revival of the doctrine of equivalents and EPC alignment.