HOW PATENT OWNERSHIP SHAPES THE FUTURE OF AI
Abstract
In the artificial intelligence age, the semiconductor patent race has seen the transfer of the patent as a device to secure innovation become a device to control access to the computational infrastructure supporting the development of AI. In this article, we explore the complex legal and economic dynamics of semiconductor patents, AI governance, market power and access to computational resources. It claims that semiconductor patents are shifting from being incentives for innovation to strategic tools that become a driver of who can develop, deploy, and scale their AI systems. The article is based on analyses from the World Economic Forum that investments in AI infrastructure across the world will total $400 billion by 2030, and from the Stanford HAI’s AI Index Report, which found that 90% of top-notch AI models were released in 2024 by industry, to OECD competition in AI infrastructure analyses that showed concentrated markets in the upstream sector and to Brookings analyses warning that three companies control two-thirds of U.S. cloud compute capacity. The analysis suggests that semiconductor patents now act as gatekeepers over AI infrastructure, and poses important questions for competition law and innovation governance.
INTRODUCTION
AI has led to the biggest infrastructure boom in history, but access to cutting-edge semiconductors and computing power is held by the few. Global investment in AI infrastructure is projected to hit $400 billion by 2030, and countries stand to lose out if they fail to grasp the concept of AI sovereignty as infrastructure ownership, according to the World Economic Forum. The semiconductor patent race mirrors how the ownership of semiconductor innovations has changed from being a protection to one of a computational infrastructure.
IP as innovation rewards is supported by traditional patent theory, however, according to a report from the Stanford HAI, 90% of notable AI models in 2024 have been developed by industry, creating a patent race for AI accelerators and GPU technologies. The OECD defines AI chips as being in a highly concentrated market where dominant firms dominate downstream ecosystems and Brookings reports that two-thirds of the U.S. cloud computer is already dominated by three firms.
The Evolution of Semiconductor Patents in The AI Era
Traditional patent rationale is based on the “incentive to invent” theory, which states that the patent system facilitates science and technology by creating economic incentives to invest in research and development to enable inventors to capture more of the social return through supra competitive prices; this is often referred to as the “reward theory”. But the semiconductor industry has changed all that. The number of semiconductor patent applications worldwide jumped 22% in 2023/24, to 80,892, led mainly by the growth in research and development in generative AI. This increase is due to the strategic change where companies no longer patent to secure their individual inventions but now involve themselves in “patent portfolio races” to minimize fears of being blocked by other patent owners. Hall and Ziedonis’s empirical analysis of the U.S. semiconductor sector illustrates how patenting intensity increased as a result of aggressive patenting by capital-intensive firms when the benefits of collecting a portfolio of “legal rights to exclude” for offensive and defensive purposes began to exceed the costs. As the number of patents swells rising by 401% in 2025 alone to 596 by early 2026 the semiconductor industry’s patent landscape is clearly more than just a reward for innovators; it’s a strategic tool for market control.
How Patent Ownership Influences Access to AI Development
GPUs, AI accelerators, and high-integration packaging are essential to modern AI systems to run huge amounts of computation in training and inference. It took OpenAI 10,000 NVIDIA V100 GPUs to train GPT-3, which cost an estimated 1,287MWh of electricity. According to Stanford HAI, there are “scaling laws” that are predictable mathematical relationships that demonstrate that as computing power increases, the performance of AI models increases and GPUs and specialized accelerators become essential to predicting the performance of AI and allocating resources. Bandwidths as high as 1,000 GBs have been made possible by advanced packaging technologies like 2.5D packaging with interposers and 3D hybrid bonding with pitches below 10 micrometers, thereby eliminating memory bottlenecks by using High Bandwidth Memory stacked architectures. However, that computing power exists in the hands of a few patent holders: NVIDIA has more than 1,300 patented AI hardware designs targeting enhancements to the GPUs, and Arm is licensing its architectural patents with clauses that rule out potential rivals. High concentration and barriers to entry are mentioned at every stage of the AI compute infrastructure in the 2025 report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, highlighting that only a few suppliers dominate the market. The question that comes to mind is whether patent rights can influence access to computational resources? Not only did Brookings analysis show that “intellectual property protections” are one of the three important barriers to entry, with the other two being talent and data, and computational power, but the analysis also showed that IP protections drive toward natural monopoly.
Gatekeeping the Future of AI: Competition, Innovation, and the Risks of Patent Concentration
Patent thickets in AI chips effectively make it difficult for anyone to compete in market segments, forcing competitors to license multiple patents and increasing risk of holdup from post-design patents. In the case of advanced semiconductors, with specialized facilities owned by a handful of foundries, the FTC’s Rambus Inc. analysis illustrated the critical role that essential patents play in creating overlapping rights that block competitive entry. To address inefficiencies and to limit the risk of litigation, firms engage in cross-licensing and patent pools arrangements in which patent owners license patents to each other or third parties. However, patent pools can also discourage outsiders from investing in R&D, as the pool’s research may be diverted from the technology of the pool towards other technologies, with the added risk of litigation for outsiders who must compete with all members of the pool. The critical question here is then when does patent protection become infrastructure control? When pools fail to license technology, but instead limit the availability of these technologies, antitrust concerns arise. When existing technology relationships create a barrier to entry for startups, antitrust concerns also arise. The WIPO 2024 World Intellectual Property Report shows that innovative results are highly skewed for emerging economies, with the top eight countries (5% of the countries studied) claiming 80% of the international patenting activity, which will lead to further inequality and hinder the benefits of AI for those who cannot access the proprietary technologies. High transaction costs due to dense patent landscapes for negotiating licenses, especially for commercialization with complementary patents.
CONCLUSION
Semiconductor patents have conclusively shifted from being awards for innovation to a means of infrastructure control. This transformation is actively changing who has AI capabilities. Having a few dominant players in the patent ownership is a huge roadblock to startups and emerging economies. If semiconductor IP is to become an impenetrable barrier to the distribution of computational power in our AI-future, we must step in before it happens with the help of competition law.
REFERENCES
https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/Final_AWP_251_2.pdf
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2026/02/artificial-intelligence-microchip-ai-nvidia/
IDEA (Vol. 50, No. 4) on cumulative innovation in patent law https://ipmall.info/sites/default/files/hosted_resources/IDEA/idea-vol50-no4-tur-sinai.pdf
University of Essex Economics on reward theory : https://www.essex.ac.uk/-/media/documents/departments/economics/mikushnica-eesj-s19.pdf
Mathys & Squire/Law360 on 22% global semiconductor patent increase: https://www.mathys-squire.com/insights-and-events/news/semiconductor-patent-applications-up-22-globally-to-81000-a-year/
Harvard/Berkeley Hall & Ziedonis (RJE 2001) empirical study : https://eml.berkeley.edu/~bhhall/papers/HallZiedonis%20RJE01.pdf
IIPRD on neuromorphic computing patent surge : https://www.iiprd.com/global-patent-wars-in-the-semiconductor-and-ai-industry
OpenAI GPT-3 Training Requirements : AI Scaling: From Up to Down and Out : https://arxiv.org/html/2502.01677v1
Stanford HAI, Scaling Laws, What are Scaling Laws? (Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, 2024) https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-definitions/what-are-scaling-laws
IDTechEx, Advanced Packaging Report, Advanced Semiconductor Packaging 2025-2035 (IDTechEx Research, October 2024) : https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/advanced-semiconductor-packaging/1042
AIPLA, Patent Licensing Bottlenecks, Patent Licensing Bottlenecks in AI Infrastructure: The Case for Antitrust Intervention (American Intellectual Property Law Association, December 2025) : https://www.aipla.org/list/innovate-articles/patent-licensing-bottlenecks-in-ai-infrastructure–the-case-for-antitrust-intervention
Lumenci, AI Hardware Patents, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hardware: Patents, Trends, and Innovations (Lumenci, January 2025) : https://lumenci.com/blogs/artificial-intelligence-ai-hardware-patents-trends-and-innovations/
OECD, Competition in AI Infrastructure, Competition in Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure (OECD, November 2025) : https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/competition-in-artificial-intelligence-infrastructure_623d1874-en/full-report/component-3.html
Brookings Institution, Market Concentration, Market Concentration Implications of Foundation Models (Brookings, October 2025)By Anton Korinek and Jai Vipra : https://www.brookings.edu/articles/market-concentration-implications-of-foundation-models-the-invisible-hand-of-chatgpt/
Patent Pools, Competition, and Innovation – Evidence from 20 U.S. Pools (FTC Bureau of Economics, 2006) : https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/bureau-economics-seminar-series-calendar-archive/130307patentpools.pdf
Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting (Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 1, 1999) : https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/ipe.1.25056143
Artificial Intelligence Patent Clusters (CSET, Georgetown University, January 2026): https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/artificial-intelligence-patent-clusters/