THE COPYRIGHT STORY BEHIND INTERNET MEMES

ABSTRACT

In the digital age, meme is universal language of the internet. It shared freely and endlessly as it belongs to everyone. The legal ownership of meme often remains misunderstood. A simple photograph shared on the internet can become much more than a joke; it can become a valuable intellectual property asset. While millions of people view, share, and modify memes every day, few stop to consider who actually owns them. Some viral images have generated substantial revenue through licensing and commercial use, while others have spread across the internet without their creators receiving any benefit. This blog explores how copyright law applies to memes, why virality does not necessarily mean loss of ownership, and how famous meme photographs transformed from moments of internet humour into assets worth thousands and sometimes millions. Through popular examples and legal insights, it highlights the often-overlooked relationship between internet culture and intellectual property rights. 

INTRODUCTION

Have you ever thought the funny meme you just shared for free, somebody owns that and they can file a suit against you in violation of their copyright. In the digital world, you can excess most of things for free but have ever thought that the meme photo we used in our post, story or created a sticker feeling that they are like air just free, but they are not. The internet often treats memes as public property. A meme goes viral is copied thousands of times and appears on multiple platforms, advertisement and merchandise yet the original photograph remains protected by copyright, regardless of how widely it is shared.

There are two type of legal reality which leads to a paradox. Some copyright holders have earned substantial sum of money by exercising their intellectual property rights, while others have watched their images circulate globally without receiving compensation. The story of internet memes is therefore not merely a story of online humour but it is a story of ownership, licencing, commercialization and the relevance of copyright law in digital age.

WHAT IS COPYRIGHT

To understand whether meme can be protected under copyright, we have to understand what is actually a copyright and what are the things that are protected under this. Copyright is a legal protection given to the creators of original works such as books, music, paintings, films, photographs and sound recordings. It allows the owner to control how the work is used and prevents others from using it without permission.

In India copyright protection generally lats for lifetime for the author plus 60 years after their death for literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, while cinematograph films, sound recordings, photographs, government works, and certain other works are protected for 60 years from the year following their first publication. Copyright naturally arises when an original work is created and can be licensed. During the period of protection, only the copyright owner or authorized persons can commercially exploit it. After the copyright term expires, the work enters the public domain, making it freely available for anyone to use, reproduce or publish without obtaining permission or paying royalites.

WHO REALLY OWNS A MEME?

The popularity of a meme often creates the misconception that it belongs to everyone. Legally, however, virality does not extinguish copyright ownership. In most cases, the original photograph remains protected under copyright law, and the photographer retains exclusive rights over its reproduction and commercial use. This raises an important distinction between internet culture and legal ownership: a meme may be viewed by millions, yet still belong to one person. The phenomenon demonstrates that copyright law continues to protect creative works even after they become part of popular online culture.

CASES OF MEME COPYRIGHT

1. The Grumpy Cat- A cat who made millions through internet. The Grumpy Cat case shows how copyright can be commercially valuable and legally enforceable. After Grumpy Cat became an internet sensation, its owner, Tabatha Bundesen, established Grumpy Cat Limited and licensed the cat’s image for various products. In 2013, the company granted Grenade Beverage Company permission to use Grumpy Cat’s image only for a specific iced coffee product called “Grumppuccino.” However, Grenade later expanded the use of the image to other products, including roasted coffee and T-shirts, without authorization. Grumpy Cat Limited sued for copyright and trademark infringement, arguing that Grenade had exceeded the scope of the licensing agreement. In 2018, a California jury ruled in favor of Grumpy Cat Limited and awarded damages, holding that a licensee cannot use copyrighted material beyond the rights expressly granted in the license. The case highlights that copyright owners can take legal action when license terms are violated and that even internet memes can receive strong intellectual property protection.
2. The Disaster Girl- This case illustrates how copyright can continue to generate value long after a work becomes an internet phenomenon. The famous image of Zoë Roth smiling in front of a burning house was taken by her father, David Roth, in 2005, making the Roth family the copyright owners from the moment the photograph was created. Although the image was widely used online for years without generating income for the family, they retained ownership of the copyright. In 2021, Zoë sold the original digital photograph as an NFT for approximately $500,000 while keeping the copyright and securing a royalty on future resales. This meant that although the buyer owned the NFT, the Roth family still controlled the commercial use and licensing of the image. The case demonstrates that copyright exists automatically upon creation, remains valuable even after widespread online circulation, and can create new economic opportunities through emerging technologies such as NFTs.
3. The Success Kid- The Success Kid case demonstrates that widespread internet sharing does not eliminate copyright ownership. The famous meme originated from a photograph taken by Sammy Griner’s mother, Laney Griner, in 2007, and she later registered the copyright and licensed the image for commercial use to major companies. In 2020, the campaign of politician Steve King used the Success Kid image in fundraising posts without obtaining permission or paying a licensing fee. Laney Griner filed a copyright infringement lawsuit, and a jury found the campaign liable. Although the damages awarded were modest, the courts rejected the campaign’s arguments that the image was freely available online or that its political use qualified as fair use. The final ruling confirmed that the copyright owner retains exclusive rights over a work regardless of its popularity on the internet and that unauthorized commercial or fundraising use can constitute copyright infringement.

CONCLUSION

Through the internet it may seems that memes are free but they are not. They are photographs taken by real people and they are protected under copyright law in India. Sometimes they earn millions through their artistic work such as grumpy cat and others. The result is a modern paradox. Some creators have earned substantial fortunes because they understood and enforced their rights. Others have watched their creations generate value for everyone except themselves. In the age of virality, the most important question is no longer whether a meme belongs to the internet. The real question is whether the internet has forgotten that someone owned it in the first place.

REFERENCES

Copyright Act, No. 14 of 1957, India Code (1957).

Grumpy Cat Ltd. v. Grenade Beverage LLC, No. 8:15-cv-02036 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2018)

Griner v. King for Congress Comm., No. 8:20-cv-02977 (D. Md. filed Dec. 4, 2020).

Grumpy Cat Awarded $710,000 in Copyright Infringement Suit, NPR (Jan. 25, 2018).

Grumpy Cat Owner Awarded Over $710,000 In Coffee Lawsuit, Courthouse News Serv. / The Daily Meal (Jan. 24, 2018).

Grumpy Cat Owner Awarded Over $700,000 In Lawsuit. Cat Still Won’t Smile, NDTV (https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/grumpy-cat-owner-awarded-over-700-000-in-lawsuit-cat-still-wont-smile-1804636)

Zoë Roth Sells ‘Disaster Girl’ Meme as NFT for $500,000, BBC News (Apr. 30, 2021).

Meme Laws: Can You Get in Trouble for That Hilarious Post?, Legal Bites, https://www.legalbites.in/topics/articles/meme-laws-can-you-get-in-trouble-for-that-hilarious-post-1044123

Capelotti, João Paulo, The Dangers of Controlling Memes Through Copyright Law, 8 Eur. J. of Humour Rsch. 115 (2020), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346214820_The_dangers_of_controlling_memes_through_copyright_law.

Cathay Y. N. Smith & Stacey Lantagne, Copyright & Memes: The Fight for Success Kid, 110 Geo. L.J. Online 142 (2021), https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2021/12/Smith_Lantagne_Copyright-Memes.pdf

Are Internet Memes Subject to Copyright and Trademark Laws?, Quora (https://www.quora.com/Are-internet-memes-subject-to-copyright-and-trademark-laws-For-instance-if-a-company-wanted-to-release-a-line-of-Bed-Intruder-or-Dramatic-Chipmunk-toys-would-it-be-legal-without-attaining-consent-from-the-memes-themselves)

Memes May Look Like Harmless Fun, But Copyright Law Says Otherwise, Lexology (https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6f3c7c8e-2c60-45a1-95fe-7806c5e40753)

What is Copyright?, U.S. Copyright Office, https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/

Copyrighted Material, ScienceDirect Topics (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/copyrighted-material

Copyright Infringement, Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement